Citations

  • Alvesson M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9),1125–49. doi: 10.1177/0018726700539002
  • Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom, L. (Eds.). (2012). Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Bensimon, E. M., Polkinghorne, D. E., Bauman, G. L., & Vallejo, E. (2004). Doing research that makes a difference. Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 104-126.
  • Boud, D. & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 194-202.
  • Coburn, C.E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032006003
  • Cox, M. D. (2001). Faculty learning communities: Change agents for transforming institutions into learning organizations. To Improve the Academy, 19, 69-93.
  • Cox, M. D. (2004). Faculty Learning Community Program Director’s and Facilitator’s Handbook, Oxford, Ohio: Miami University.
  • Crossan, M., Lane, H., & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (1997). Cognition, complexity, and teacher education. Harvard Education Review, 67, 105-125.
  • Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
  • Kezar, A., & Gehrke S. (2015). Communities of Transformation and their Work Toward Achieving Scale for STEM Reform. Pullias Center for Higher Education, Rossier School of Education.
  • Kraus Tarka, D., & Janice B. (2012). STEM practice and assessment: SENCER’s influence on educators. Science Education and Civic Engagement: The Next Level (pp. 163-178). ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 1121.
  • Mittendorff, K, Geijsel, F., Hoeve, A., de Laat, M., & Nieuwenhuis, L. (2006). Communities of practice as stimulating forces for collective learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(5), 298–312.
  • National Research Council. (2003a). Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10024
  • National Research Council. (2003b). Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10711
  • Nugent, J. S., Reardon, R. M., Smith, F. G., Rhodes, J. A., Zander, M. J., & Carter, T. J. (2008). Exploring faculty learning communities: Building connections among teaching, learning, and technology. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 51–58.
  • Pena, E. V., Bensimon, E. M., & Colyar, J. (2006). Contextual problem defining: Learning to think and act. Liberal Education, 92(2), 48-55.
  • Sànchez-Cardona, I., Sànchez-Lugo, J., & Vèlez-Gonzàlez, J. (2012). Exploring the potential of communities of practice for learning and collaboration in a higher education context. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1820-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.385
  • Singer S. (2008). Linking evidence and learning goals (Commissioned paper presented at NRC workshop on Evidence on Selected Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved January 9, 2016
  • Sipple, S., & Lightner, R. (Eds.). (2013). Developing faculty learning communities at two-year colleges: Collaborative models to improve teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Viskovic, A. (2006). Becoming a tertiary teacher: Learning in communities of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 323-339. doi: 10.1080/07294360600947285